Hello again,
There are a number of good arguments on this thread. Most seem to give the GB more slack than I personally think is just. Such examples as that they are infected by or caught-up in the system, etc. are no excuse IMHO. Why? They willfully decide on or allow evil, murderous policies to stand:
1. They ignore information that shows their position to be dead wrong. An example relates to their position years ago that eating blood was wrong and that transfusions were the same as eating blood. Their conclusion was based on extremely poor scholarship. When is was demonstrated to them that transfusion of blood was the same as an organ transplant and very different than eating blood, they stopped-up their ears and refused to change. The result: death to thousands of JWs.
2. When their chronology was examined and found to be wrong and the data presented to them, what did they do? They found a way to DF the person who had done all of the scholarly work.
3. When any doctrinal position is changed do they issue a directive clearly stating the change from xxx to yyy? No!
4. They flat out lie. Many examples have been posted on this board. One lie that always screamed at me was their claim that elders were a shelter from storms that the Devil’s world sent our way. The experiences of many of us had been that elders were the source of many of those storms, not the shelter from them.
5. Do they ever apologize for wrong decisions or inaccurate advice or information? No!
I was raised by JW parents. From my earliest memories I had doubts, mostly because of their constant bragging. What really confirmed for me their inexcusable arrogance was their refusal to admit their errors surrounding the 1975 matter. It took them three years, I think, to bring up the issue and blame the “sheep” who they said had read too much into their words. A year or so later, because the numbers were still dropping, they admitted that they too were disappointed (about the 1975 matter).
Time and again the GB demonstrate that they are small men. When their position crumbles they abandon it and start in a different direction and hope that everyone will forget the previous mess. Eighty years ago elders were elected by locals. That was replaced by an appointment arrangement that was hailed as far superior (it gave Brooklyn more control). In the early 1970s the appointments were replaced by a rotating elder arrangement with many of the first appointment decisions being made locally (with Brooklyn’s approval). By the mid 70s the previous arrangement was laughed at by COs and others. Soon after that more change came because the rotating elder system was a catastrophe. In all of this there never was an admission of poor management by the GB.
Today we can witness yet another terrible crime against humanity being orchestrated by the GB. Silentlambs is heading-up the exposure of that issue.
They are murderous scums, my friends.
Sam Beli
I have seen all the works which have been done under the sun, and behold, all is vanity and striving after wind. What is crooked cannot be straightened and what is lacking cannot be counted. Solomon